DOD INSTRUCTION 8510.01
R
ISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR DOD SYSTEMS
Originating Component: Office of the DoD Chief Information Officer
Effective: July 19, 2022
Releasability: Cleared for public release. Available on the Directives Division Website
at https://www.esd.whs.mil/DD/.
Reissues and Cancels: DoD Instruction 8510.01, “Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD
Information Technology (IT),” March 12, 2014, as amended
Incorporates and Cancels: Directive-type Memorandum 20-004, “Enabling Cyberspace
Accountability of DoD Components and Information Systems,”
November 13, 2020, as amended
Approved by: John B. Sherman, DoD Chief Information Officer
Purpose: In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144.02, this issuance:
• Establishes the cybersecurity Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Systems (referred to in
this issuance as “the RMF”) and establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures
for executing and maintaining the RMF.
• Establishes and applies an integrated enterprise-wide decision structure for the RMF that includes
and integrates DoD mission areas (MAs) pursuant to DoDD 8115.01 and the governance process
prescribed in this issuance.
• Provides guidance on reciprocity of system authorization decisions for the DoD in coordination with
other Federal agencies.
• Authorizes and designates the RMF Technical Advisory Group (TAG) as the body responsible for
developing and publishing RMF implementation guidance.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1: GENERAL ISSUANCE INFORMATION .............................................................................. 4
1.1. Applicability. .................................................................................................................... 4
1.2. Policy. ............................................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................................................................................... 6
2.1. DoD CISO. ........................................................................................................................ 6
2.2. Director, Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). ................................................ 6
2.3. Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. ........................................ 7
2.4. USD(R&E). ....................................................................................................................... 7
2.5. DOT&E. ............................................................................................................................ 8
2.6. Director, National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service. .............................. 8
2.7. OSD and DoD Component Heads. ................................................................................... 8
2.8. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. ............................................................................ 10
2.9. Commander, United States Strategic Command. ........................................................... 11
2.10. Commander, United States Space Command. .............................................................. 11
2.11. Commander, USCYBERCOM. .................................................................................... 11
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................... 12
3.1. Overview. ........................................................................................................................ 12
3.2. RMF Steps. ..................................................................................................................... 13
a. Prepare.......................................................................................................................... 13
b. Categorize .................................................................................................................... 15
c. Select. ........................................................................................................................... 15
d. Implement. ................................................................................................................... 16
e. Assess. .......................................................................................................................... 17
f. Authorize. ..................................................................................................................... 18
g. Monitor. ....................................................................................................................... 19
3.3. Integrating The RMF into the Defense Acquisition Management System. .................... 20
a. Overview. ..................................................................................................................... 20
b. Life-Cycle. ................................................................................................................... 20
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE ......................................................................... 21
4.1. Cybersecurity Risk Governance. .................................................................................... 21
4.2. Level 1 – Organization.................................................................................................... 22
a. DoD CISO. ................................................................................................................... 22
b. Risk Executive Function. ............................................................................................. 23
c. DoD Cybersecurity Architecture.................................................................................. 23
d. RMF TAG. ................................................................................................................... 24
e. RMF KS. ...................................................................................................................... 24
4.3. Level 2 – Mission or Business Processes. ...................................................................... 24
a. JCA CPM. .................................................................................................................... 25
b. PAO.............................................................................................................................. 25
c. DoD Component CIO. ................................................................................................. 25
d. DoD Component CISO. ............................................................................................... 26
4.4. Level 3 – Systems. .......................................................................................................... 27
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
a. AOs. ............................................................................................................................. 27
b. System Cybersecurity Program. ................................................................................... 28
4.5. RMF Role Appointment. ................................................................................................ 30
SECTION 5: RMF KS ..................................................................................................................... 31
5.1. Overview. ........................................................................................................................ 31
5.2. RMF KS. ......................................................................................................................... 31
GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................................... 32
G.1. Acronyms. ...................................................................................................................... 32
G.2. Definitions. ..................................................................................................................... 33
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 35
TABLES
Table 1. Organization Prepare Step Tasks ................................................................................... 13
Table 2. Categorize Tasks and Outcomes .................................................................................... 15
Table 3. Select Tasks and Outcomes ........................................................................................... 15
Table 4. Implement Tasks and Outcomes .................................................................................... 16
Table 5. Assessment Tasks and Outcomes .................................................................................. 17
Table 6. Authorization Tasks and Outcomes ............................................................................... 18
Table 7. Monitor Tasks and Outcomes ........................................................................................ 19
Table 8. Appointment of RMF Roles .......................................................................................... 30
FIGURES
Figure 1. RMF Process ................................................................................................................ 12
Figure 2. Cybersecurity Risk Governance ................................................................................... 22
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 1: GENERAL ISSUANCE INFORMATION 4
SECTION 1: GENERAL ISSUANCE INFORMATION
1.1. APPLICABILITY.
This issuance applies to OSD, the Military Departments (including the Coast Guard at all times,
including when it is a Service in the Department of Homeland Security by agreement with that
Department), the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the
Combatant Commands, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the
Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the DoD
(referred to collectively in this issuance as the “DoD Components”).
1.2. POLICY.
a. The RMF process will inform acquisition processes for all DoD systems, including
requirements development, procurement, developmental test and evaluation (DT&E), operational
test and evaluation (OT&E), and sustainment; but will not replace these processes.
b. In accordance with Executive Order 13800, the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) publications will be the authoritative guidelines for the DoD RMF.
c. DoD RMF must meet the requirements of Subchapter II of Chapter 35 of Title 44, United
States Code, also known as and referred to in this issuance as the “Federal Information Security
Modernization Act of 2014” (FISMA) and Section 11331 of Title 40, United States Code.
d. Cybersecurity requirements and cyberspace operational risk management functions will
be established and applied to all programs, systems, and technologies in DoD, regardless of the
acquisition or procurement method (referred to collectively in this issuance as “systems”).
e. Accountability for cybersecurity risk accepted within DoD must be enforced at all levels
within the OSD or DoD Component in question (e.g., executive program officers, program
managers (PMs), authorizing officials (AOs), and cyberspace and functional operational
commanders) and throughout the lifecycle of its systems in accordance with DoDD 3020.04,
DoD Instructions (DoDIs) 8500.01, 8010.01, and 3020.45, and this issuance.
f. The DoD Information Enterprise will use cybersecurity reciprocity to reduce redundant
testing, assessing, documenting, and the associated costs in time and resources.
g. The RMF system authorization information will be shared to support system to system
connections across authorization boundaries and decisions for shared services within DoD, and
in coordination with other Federal agencies, as appropriate.
h. The DoD Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) will charter the RMF TAG to
interface with DoD Components on emerging RMF issues affecting the DoD Information
Network.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 1: GENERAL ISSUANCE INFORMATION 5
i. The RMF Knowledge Service (KS) (found at https://rmfks.osd.mil) will be the
authoritative source for RMF implementation guidance, standards, and tools, as governed by the
RMF TAG.
j. DoD personnel making decisions affecting cybersecurity or cyber operational risk will be
accountable, as appropriate, for those decisions.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES 6
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1. DOD CISO.
Under the authority, direction, and control of the DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO), the DoD
CISO:
a. Develops, implements, and oversees the Cybersecurity Program for DoD.
b. Oversees implementation of this issuance and the cybersecurity risk management of DoD
systems, distributes RMF standards, and supports Joint Capabilities Area (JCA) owners in
developing the required RMF guidance for their respective portfolios.
c. Establishes the construct and program for AOs, including qualification and training
requirements, and ensures acquisition programs and DoD systems have AOs appointed
consistent with that construct. The construct must ensure the AOs, with the assistance of PMs or
system owners (SOs), will:
(1) Oversee cybersecurity activities, findings, and remediation actions from
developmental, operational, and cybersecurity testing or assessment activities throughout the
system lifecycle.
(2) Ensure data from those activities are captured in security authorization packages to
inform risk-based authorization decisions.
d. Coordinates with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
(USD(R&E)) and the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) to ensure
cybersecurity DT&E and OT&E policies, procedures, and guidance integrate with the RMF
policies and procedures. Additional testing, such as user or functionality testing, is in
accordance with DoDI 5000.89.
e. Assists other organizations in executing the RMF by providing subject matter expertise in
coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
f. Incorporates United States Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) and National Security
Agency/Central Security Service cyber operational risk tolerances into security authorization
baselines, as applicable.
2.2. DIRECTOR, DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY (DISA).
Under the authority, direction, and control of the DoD CIO, and in addition to the responsibilities
in Paragraph 2.7., the Director, DISA:
a. Oversees DISA control correlation identifiers, security requirements guides, and security
technical implementation guides to maintain consistency with the Committee on National
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES 7
Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) 1253; NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-53 security and
privacy controls; and NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures.
b. Develops and provides:
(1) RMF training and awareness products.
(2) A distributed training capability to support the DoD Components in accordance with
DoDD 8140.01.
(3) Training materials posted on the DoD Cyber Exchange at https://cyber.mil.
c. Identifies or develops and distributes DoD enterprise RMF management tools.
2.3. UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISITION AND SUSTAINMENT.
In addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Sustainment:
a. Coordinates with the DoD CISO to integrate RMF policies, processes, and procedures
with Defense Acquisition System processes for acquisitions of DoD systems.
b. Verifies DoD Component acquisition program executive offices and PMs are accountable
for coordinating tradeoff decisions during sustainment of systems (i.e., decisions to withhold or
delay vulnerability remediation, which significantly impact survivability of systems under
conditions of the intended operational environment) with the requirements sponsors, AO, and
Component cyberspace operations forces.
2.4. USD(R&E).
In addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., the USD(R&E):
a. Coordinates with the DoD CISO and Director, National Security Service/Chief, Central
Security Service for consistent integration between:
(1) The RMF policies and procedures.
(2) Systems Engineering.
(3) Developmental test, evaluation, and assessment policies and procedures.
(4) Guidance for acquisition of DoD digital capabilities, including national security
systems in coordination with the Director, National Security Service/Chief, Central Security
Service.
b. Provides the RMF TAG with input as appropriate or required.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES 8
2.5. DOT&E.
In addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., the DOT&E:
a. Reviews the plans, execution, and results of operational testing to adequately evaluate
cybersecurity for all DoD information technology acquisitions subject to oversight.
b. In coordination with the DoD CISO, ensures OT&E findings are integrated into the RMF
and provides the RMF TAG with input as appropriate or required.
2.6. DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CHIEF, CENTRAL SECURITY
SERVICE.
Under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and
Security and the DoD CIO, as applicable in accordance with Section 142(b)(1)(D) of Title 10,
United States Code, in addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., and in coordination with
the DoD CISO, the Director, National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service:
a. Recommends solutions to mitigate vulnerabilities in current operational weapons and
space systems.
b. Recommends solutions to harden the security design of future systems.
c. Assesses the overall security posture of National Security Systems, identifies their
vulnerabilities, and disseminates information regarding threats to DoD.
d. In coordination with the cognizant AO, assesses cybersecurity requirements and
information system security architectures of applicable National Security Systems before
program initiation for new systems and all acquisition milestones.
e. Provides verified system security engineering services to support the RMF when provided
to DoD Components.
f. Delivers threat and risk reports to support authorization decisions.
2.7. OSD AND DOD COMPONENT HEADS.
OSD and DoD Component heads:
a. Integrate Component cybersecurity throughout system engineering and testing processes
that contribute to cyber resilience, survivability, materiel readiness, and cyberspace operational
readiness.
b. Manage Component cybersecurity risks to respective systems in accordance with the
principles and processes contained in this issuance.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES 9
c. Establish and maintain cybersecurity governance bodies and methods to monitor and
manage system cybersecurity risks and integrate their Component governance processes with the
DoD enterprise governance processes in this issuance.
d. Develop and maintain Component level guidance required by the “Prepare” step of the
RMF and verify that all subcomponents build and maintain the necessary guidance for their
business or mission function.
e. Categorize systems and select controls in accordance with CNSSI 1253 and implement a
corresponding set of security controls in accordance with NIST SP 800-53.
f. Require use of the DoD-specific assignment values, overlays, implementation guidance,
and assessment procedures found on the RMF KS.
g. Identify and allocate resources for the RMF in the DoD Planning, Programming,
Budgeting, and Execution process.
h. Implement continuous monitoring activities in accordance with Office of Management
and Budget Memorandum M-14-03, NIST SP 800-137, NIST SP 800-137A, and DoDIs 8530.01
and 8531.01.
i. Develop and maintain a plan of action and milestones (POA&M) to address known
vulnerabilities in the system, subsystems, and system components in accordance with DoDI
8531.01.
j. Adhere to a Component cybersecurity program in accordance with DoDI 8500.01.
k. Conduct RMF activities in all phases of the DoD acquisition process (i.e., requirements
development, procurement, DT&E, OT&E, and sustainment) to increase security and decrease
cost.
l. Verify the appointment of a PM or SO for all Component systems.
m. Appoint an AO for every system operating within or on behalf of the Component in
accordance with DoDI 8500.01 and Appendix D, Paragraph D.6 of NIST SP 800-39 and
authorize systems in accordance with this issuance. The AOs must:
(1) Only be government personnel. This role cannot be re-delegated to personnel who
do not meet this requirement.
(2) Possess relevant expertise with the leveraged technology as part of the system, and
this must be a factor in their selection and appointment as an official responsible for authorizing
systems.
(3) Manage and reduce cybersecurity risk and complete duties, which are evaluated in
annual performance evaluation criteria.
(4) Complete AO training or an RMF training course offered by NIST.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES 10
n. Develop and issue systems guidance that reflects Component-unique operational and
environmental demands as needed.
o. Verify that Component processes regarding the RMF, cybersecurity, systems engineering,
and testing are integrated and actively share system-related data across these processes as
contributors to cyber resilience, survivability, materiel readiness, and cyberspace operational
readiness.
p. Direct PMs and information SOs to maintain DoD systems under their authority to
comply with the RMF.
q. Operate only authorized DoD systems with a current authorization to operate (ATO), and
maintain authorized DoD systems are maintained under their authority to comply with RMF.
r. Manage, maintain, and mitigate risks throughout the system lifecycle in accordance with
cybersecurity operational requirements.
s. Oversee and verify that personnel engaged in, or supporting, the RMF are appropriately
trained and possess professional certifications in accordance with DoDD 8140.01 and supporting
issuances.
t. Ensure Component information SOs appoint user representatives (URs) for DoD systems
under their purview.
u. Coordinate Component’s participation in the RMF TAG.
v. Require that contracts and other agreements include specific requirements in accordance
with this issuance.
w. Provide cybersecurity developmental, operational, and sustainment test and evaluation
(T&E), and assessment results for acquisition and fielded programs to the appropriate AO to
inform ATO decisions.
x. Ensure acquisition programs submit cybersecurity T&E results to the appropriate AO to
inform ATO decisions.
y. Ensure acquisition programs develop evaluation metrics for DT&E and OT&E, and
continuous monitoring, at the beginning of the development process.
2.8. CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.
In coordination with the DoD CISO, and in addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
a. Requires the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System process to support
and document system categorization in accordance with this issuance.
b. Maps systems to dependent missions.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 2: RESPONSIBILITIES 11
c. Supports JCA owners in developing required RMF guidance for their portfolios.
2.9. COMMANDER, UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND.
In addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., the Commander, United States Strategic
Command:
a. Serves as the AO for nuclear command, control, and communication systems as identified
by the Joint Staff (as the Warfighting MA Principal AO (PAO)).
b. Delegates system-level responsibilities, as required.
2.10. COMMANDER, UNITED STATES SPACE COMMAND.
In addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., the Commander, United States Space
Command:
a. Assigns AOs for space systems.
b. Issues authorization guidance in accordance with this issuance for space systems.
c. Resolves authorization issues for space systems used by the DoD in accordance with
DoDI 8500.01 and Committee on National Security Systems Policy No. 12.
2.11. COMMANDER, USCYBERCOM.
In coordination with the DoD CISO and in addition to the responsibilities in Paragraph 2.7., the
Commander, USCYBERCOM:
a. Coordinates with the other DoD Component heads to:
(1) Ensure all cybersecurity risk management decision-makers are aware of significant
cybersecurity risks.
(2) Integrate the vulnerability management process into the RMF process.
b. Coordinates with the Director, National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service
to make cyberspace operations forces’ operational risk tolerances and relevant cyber threat
information available to all cybersecurity risk management decision-makers to eliminate isolated
processes.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 12
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION
3.1. OVERVIEW.
The RMF process for lifecycle cybersecurity risk to DoD systems is in accordance with the NIST
SP 800-30, 800-37, 800-39, 800-53A, 800-137, Committee on National Security Systems Policy
No. 22, CNSSI No. 1253 and 1254, DoDD 8000.01, and DoDI 8500.01. The RMF process
adopts the NIST RMF in accordance with NIST SP 800-37 to comply with FISMA requirements.
This process is intended to ensure DoD systems with digital capabilities, including National
Security Systems, are engineered for cyber survivability. This is done by integrating controls
that support security, privacy, operational resilience, supply chain risk management, and the best
cyber intelligence, or commercial cyber threat information available at the system and
organizational levels.
a. The RMF consists of the steps depicted in Figure 1. This process integrates with the
system life-cycle and system security engineering processes. The program initiates or updates
RMF activities during system inception (e.g., documented during requirements identification)
and for any significant system modifications (e.g., engineering changes). Refer to the RMF KS
section on ‘System and Environment Changes’ for further information regarding what is
included in significant system modification.
Figure 1. RMF Process
b. Failure to initiate the RMF at system or program inception is not a justification for
ignoring or not complying with the RMF. Systems without an ATO must begin the RMF,
regardless of the system life-cycle stage (e.g., acquisition, operation). Chapter 3 of NIST SP
800-37 details the steps of the RMF, with additional guidance on the RMF KS.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 13
c. The RMF process applies to all systems and organizations regardless of acquisition
pathway in the DoD, as well as DoD partnered systems and organizations where it has been
agreed that DoD standards will be followed.
(1) DoD systems (e.g., weapons systems, stand-alone systems, control systems, or any
other type of systems with digital capabilities) must receive and maintain a valid authorization
before beginning operations. Refer to the RMF KS for additional guidance on authorizations.
(2) Technologies below the system level (e.g., system components, hardware, software,
external services) do not require an ATO. However, these technologies must still complete
specific RMF assessment procedures under the “Assess Only” process. Refer to the KS for more
information on these “Assess Only” processes.
3.2. RMF STEPS.
a. Prepare.
Prepare to execute the RMF from an organizational and system-level perspective by setting
context and priorities for privacy and security risk management to carry out essential activities at
the organization, mission and business process, and information system levels of the
organization. The “Prepare” step tasks must be completed by the DoD Component CIO, DoD
PAO, and JCA capability portfolio manager (CPM) to enable an effective risk-managed security
authorization process. See Table 1 for “Prepare” step tasks. For additional guidance, see the
RMF KS.
Table 1. Organization Prepare Step Tasks
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task P-1
Risk Management Roles
Individuals are identified and assigned
key roles for executing the RMF.
[Cybersecurity Framework (CSF):
ID.AM-6; ID.GV-2]
• Head of Agency
• Chief Information Officer (CIO)
•
Senior Agency Official for Privacy
Task P-2
Risk Management Strategy
A risk management strategy for the
organization that includes a
determination and expression of
organizational risk tolerance is
established. [CSF: ID.RM; ID.SC]
Head of Agency
Task P-3
Risk Assessment – Organization
An organization-wide risk assessment is
completed, or an existing risk
assessment is updated. [CSF: ID.RA;
ID.SC-2]
• Senior Accountable Official for Risk
Management or Risk Executive
(Function)
• Senior Agency information security
officer (ISO)
•
Senior Agency Official for Privacy
Task P-4
Organizationally – Tailored Control
Baselines and CSF Profiles (Optional)
Organizationally-tailored control
baselines and/or CSF profiles are
established and made available. [CSF:
Profile]
• Mission or Business Owner
Senior Accountable Official for Risk
Management or Risk Executive
(Function)
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 14
Table 1. Organization Prepare Step Tasks, Continued
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task P-5
Common Control Identification
Common controls that are available for
inheritance by organizational systems
are identified, documented, and
published.
• Senior Agency ISO
• Senior Agency Official for Privacy
Task P-6
Impact – Level Prioritization (Optional)
A prioritization of organizational
systems with the same impact level is
conducted. [CSF: ID.AM-5]
Senior Accountable Official for Risk
Management or Risk Executive
(Function)
Task P-7
Continuous Monitoring Strategy –
Organization
An organization-wide strategy for
monitoring control effectiveness is
developed and implemented. [CSF:
DE.CM; ID.SC-4]
Senior Accountable Official for Risk
Management or Risk Executive
(Function)
Task P-8
Mission or Business Focus
Missions, business functions, and
mission or business processes that the
system is intended to support are
identified. [CSF: Profile;
Implementation Tiers; ID.BE]
Mission or Business Owner
Task P-9
System Stakeholders
The stakeholders having an interest in
the system are identified. [CSF:
ID.AM; ID.BE]
• Mission or Business Owner
• SO
Task P-10
Asset Identification
Stakeholder assets are identified and
prioritized. [CSF: ID.AM]
• SO
Task P-11
Authorization Boundary
The authorization boundary (i.e.,
system) is determined.
• AO
Task P-12
Information Types
The types of information processed,
stored, and transmitted by the system
are identified. [CSF: ID.AM-5]
• SO
• Information Owner (IO) or Steward
Task P-13
Information Life Cycle
All stages of the information life cycle
are identified and understood for each
information type processed, stored, or
transmitted by the system. [CSF:
ID.AM-3; ID.AM-4]
• Senior Agency Official for Privacy
• SO
• IO or Steward
Task P-14
Mission-Based Cyber Risk Assessment
A system-level risk assessment is
completed or an existing risk
assessment is updated. [CSF: ID.RA;
ID.SC-2]
• SO
• Information System Security Officer
(ISSO)
• System Privacy Officer
Task P-15
Requirements Definition
Security and privacy requirements are
defined and prioritized. [CSF: ID.GV;
PR.IP]
• Mission or Business Owner
• SO
• IO or Steward
• System Privacy Officer
Task P-16
Enterprise Architecture
The placement of the system within the
enterprise architecture is determined.
• Mission or Business Owner
• Enterprise Architect
• Security Architect
• Privacy Architect
Task P-17
Requirements Allocation
Security and privacy requirements are
allocated to the system and to the
environment in which the system
operates. [CSF: ID.GV]
• Security Architect
• Privacy Architect
• ISSO
• System Privacy Officer
Task P-18
System Registration
The system is registered for purposes of
management, accountability,
coordination, and oversight. [CSF:
ID.GV]
• SO
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 15
b. Categorize
Categorize the system in accordance with CNSSI No. 1253 based on the information
analyzed, stored, and relayed by the system and an analysis of the impact of potential loss of
confidentiality, integrity, and availability to organizational operations and assets, individuals,
other organizations, and the Nation with respect to the loss of confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of organizational systems. See Table 2 for a list of tasks and outcomes.
Table 2. Categorize Tasks and Outcomes
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task C-1
System Description
The characteristics of the system are described
and documented. [CSF: Profile]
• SO
Task C-2
Security Categorization
• A security categorization of the system,
including the information processed by the
system represented by the organization-
identified information types, is completed.
[CSF: ID.AM-1; ID.AM-2; ID.AM-3;
ID.AM-4; ID.AM-5]
• Security categorization results are
documented in the security, privacy, and
supply chain risk management plans. [CSF:
Profile]
• Security categorization results are consistent
with the enterprise architecture and
commitment to protecting organizational
missions, business functions, and mission or
business processes. [CSF: Profile]
• Security categorization results reflect the
organization’s risk management strategy.
• SO
• IO or Steward
Task C-3
Security Categorization Review and
Approval
The security categorization results are
reviewed, and the categorization decision is
approved by senior leaders in the organization.
• AO or AO Designated
Representative (AODR)
• Senior Agency Official for
Privacy (for systems processing
personal identifiable
information)
c. Select.
Choose an initial set of system controls and tailor the controls as necessary to reduce risk to
an acceptable level based on a risk assessment. See Table 3 for a list of tasks and outcomes.
Table 3. Select Tasks and Outcomes
Tasks
Primary Responsibility
Task S-1
Control Selection
system commensurate with risk are selected.
[CSF: Profile]
• SO
• Common Control Provider
Task S-2
Control Tailoring
control baselines. [CSF: Profile]
• SO
• Common Control Provider
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 16
Table 3. Select Tasks and Outcomes, Continued
Tasks
Primary Responsibility
Task S-3
Control Allocation
hybrid, or common controls.
• Controls are allocated to the specific system
elements (i.e., machine, physical, or human
elements). [CSF: Profile; PR.IP]
• Security Architect
• Privacy Architect
• ISSO
• System Privacy Officer
Task S-4
Documentation of Planned Control
Implementations
documented in security and privacy plans or
equivalent documents. [CSF: Profile]
• SO
• Common Control Provider
Task S-5
Continuous Monitoring Strategy –
System
system that reflects the organizational risk
management strategy is developed. [CSF:
• SO
• Common Control Provider
Task S-6
Plan Review and Approval
selection of controls necessary to protect the
system and the environment of operation
commensurate with risk are reviewed and
•
AO or AODR
d. Implement.
Implement the controls and describe how the controls are employed within the system and its
operating environment. See Table 4 for a list of tasks and outcomes.
Table 4. Implement Tasks and Outcomes
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task I-1
Control Implementation
• Controls specified in the
security and privacy plans
are implemented. [CSF:
PR.IP-1]
• Systems security and
privacy engineering
methodologies are used to
implement the controls in
system security and privacy
plans. [CSF: PR.IP-2]
• SO
• Common Control Provider
Task I-2
Update Control Implementation
Information
• Changes to the planned
implementation of controls
are documented. [CSF:
PR.IP-1]
• The security and privacy
plans are updated based on
information obtained during
the implementation of the
controls. [CSF:
Profile
]
• SO
• Common Control Provider
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 17
e. Assess.
Assess the controls to determine whether they are being correctly implemented, operating as
intended, and producing the desired outcomes in meeting the requirements for security and
privacy. See Table 5 for a list of tasks and outcomes.
Table 5. Assessment Tasks and Outcomes
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task A-1
Assessor Selection
• An assessor or assessment team is
selected to conduct the control
assessments.
• The appropriate level of
independence is achieved for the
assessor or assessment team
selected.
• AO or AODR
Task A-2
Assessment Plan
• Documentation needed to conduct the
assessments is provided to the assessor
or assessment team.
• Security Assessment Plans include
documentation of test events and
resources that can support assessments,
coordinated with developers and
developmental and operational testers.
T&E strategy includes high-level
description of assessment plans.
• Security, privacy, and supply chain risk
management assessment activities are
developed and documented.
• Assessment are reviewed by the
security control assessor (SCA) and
approved by the AO to establish the
expectations for the control
assessments and the level of effort
required.
• AO or AODR
• Control Assessor
Task A-3
Control Assessments
• Control assessments are conducted
in accordance with the security and
privacy assessment plans.
• Developer, engineering,
developmental, and operational test
events are conducted to support
assessments.
• Opportunities to reuse assessment
results from previous assessments to
make the risk management process
timely and cost-effective are
considered.
• Use of automation to conduct control
assessments is maximized to increase
the speed, effectiveness, and efficiency
of assessments.
• Control Assessor
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 18
Table 5. Assessment Tasks and Outcomes, Continued
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task A-4
Assessment Reports
• Assessment reports that provide
findings and recommendations are
completed and include results from
developer, engineering,
developmental, and operational test
events.
• Assessment reports include results
from developer, engineering,
developmental, and operational test
events.
• Control Assessor
Task A-5
Remediation Actions
• Remediation actions to address
deficiencies in the controls
implemented in the system and
environment of operation are taken.
• Security and privacy plans are updated
to reflect control implementation
changes made based on the assessments
and subsequent remediation actions.
[CSF: Profile]
• SO
• Common Control Provider
• Control Assessor
Task A-6
A Plan of Actions and Milestones
POA&M detailing remediation plans for
unacceptable risks identified in security and
privacy assessment reports is developed. [CSF:
ID.RA-6]
• SO
• Common Control Provider
f. Authorize.
Authorize the system based on a determination of whether the risk to organizational
operations and assets, individuals, agencies, commands, and the Nation is acceptable, and
cyberspace operational commanders’ requirements are met. Final risk determination and
authorization decision definitions (e.g., interim authorization to test, ATO, ATO with conditions,
and denial ATO) and examples are on the RMF KS. See Table 6 for a list of tasks and outcomes.
Table 6. Authorization Tasks and Outcomes
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task R-1
Authorization Package
An authorization package is developed
for submission to the AO.
• SO
• Common Control Provider
• Senior Agency Official for Privacy
Task R-2
Risk Analysis and Determination
A risk determination by the AO that
reflects the risk management strategy,
including risk tolerance, is rendered.
• AO or AODR
Task R-3
Risk Response
Risk responses for determined risks are
provided. [CSF: ID.RA-6]
• AO or AODR
Task R-4
Authorization Decision
The authorization for the system or the
common controls is approved or denied.
• AO
Task R-5
Authorization Reporting
Authorization decisions, significant
vulnerabilities, and risks are reported to
organizational officials.
• AO or AODR
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 19
(1) The security authorization documentation consists of all artifacts developed through
RMF activity and is maintained throughout a system’s life-cycle. The security authorization
documentation package is the minimum information necessary for the receiving organization to
accept a system. The security authorization documentation package is made up of:
(a) The security plan.
(b) The security assessment report.
(c) All POA&Ms.
(d) The authorization decision document.
(2) Detailed information on the content and use of the security authorization package is
available on the RMF KS.
g. Monitor.
Monitor the system and associated controls on an ongoing basis, including monitoring the
effectiveness of controls, documenting system and operating environment changes, conducting
risk assessments and impact analyses, and reporting on system security and privacy. See Table 7
for a list of tasks and outcomes.
Table 7. Monitor Tasks and Outcomes
Tasks
Outcomes
Primary Responsibility
Task M-1
System and Environment Changes
The system and environment of
operation are monitored in accordance
with the continuous monitoring
strategy. [CSF: DE.CM; ID.GV]
• PM or SO
• Common Control Provider
• Senior Agency ISO
• Senior Agency Official for Privacy
Task M-2
Ongoing Assessments
Ongoing testing and assessments of
control effectiveness are conducted in
accordance with the continuous
monitoring strategy. [CSF: ID.SC-4]
• Control Assessor
Task M-3
Ongoing Risk Response
The output of continuous monitoring
activities is analyzed and responded to
appropriately. [CSF: RS.AN]
• AO
• PM or SO
•
Common Control Provider
Task M-4
Authorization Package Updates
Risk management documents are
updated based on continuous
monitoring activities. [CSF: RS.IM]
• PM or SO
• Common Control Provider
Task M-5
Security and Privacy Reporting
A process is in place to report the
security, privacy, and supply chain risk
management posture to the AO and
other senior leaders and executives.
• PM or SO
• Common Control Provider
• Senior Agency ISO
•
Senior Agency Official for Privacy
Task M-6
Ongoing Authorization
AOs conduct ongoing authorizations
using the results of continuous
monitoring activities and communicate
changes in risk determination and
acceptance decisions.
• AO
Task M-7
System Disposal
A system disposal strategy is developed
and implemented, as needed.
• PM or SO
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 3: DOD AND NIST RMF IMPLEMENTATION 20
3.3. INTEGRATING THE RMF INTO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
a. Overview.
The RMF is designed to complement and support the Defense Acquisition System activities,
milestones, and phases.
(1) RMF activities must be initiated as early as possible in the DoD acquisition process
to increase security and decrease cost.
(2) Requirements, development, procurement, and T&E processes must apply the RMF
in the acquisition of DoD information technology.
(3) Risks to systems must be designated consistent with the most severe threat to any
individual component or subcomponent for consideration of requirements, acquisition, and T&E.
b. Life-Cycle.
(1) The Adaptive Acquisition Framework is defined and illustrated in DoDI 5000.02.
(2) Alignment of RMF steps to the acquisition lifecycle can be found on the RMF KS.
(3) DoDI 5000.90 establishes policy for the acquisition PM’s role and responsibilities for
managing cybersecurity, including the RMF, throughout the program’s acquisition lifecycle.
(4) See DoDIs 5000.82, 5000.83, 5000.89, and 5000.90 for details on integrating RMF in
acquisition functional processes.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 21
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE
4.1. CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE.
The DoD cybersecurity risk governance structure implements the three-level approach to the
cybersecurity risk management described in NIST SP 800-39. It synchronizes and integrates
cybersecurity activities across all phases of the system life-cycle, spanning logical and
organizational entities.
a. Within the cybersecurity risk governance structure, governance bodies (e.g., DoD
Information Security Risk Management Committee (DoD ISRMC), Defense
Security/Cybersecurity Authorization Working Group (DSAWG)) play a critical role in
cybersecurity risk acceptance for the DoD, mitigating critical vulnerabilities, integrating
information sharing, and ensuring a balance between organizational and tactical cybersecurity
risk.
b. Successful cybersecurity risk governance requires cooperation across all levels, including
governance bodies, organizational leadership, IOs or stewards, operational commanders, and
system-level owners and operators.
c. Governance elements are illustrated in Figure 2 and further explained in this section.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 22
Figure 2. Cybersecurity Risk Governance
4.2. LEVEL 1 – ORGANIZATION.
The organization described in Level 1 is the OSD or strategic level. It addresses risk
management at the DoD enterprise level. The key governance elements and resources in Level 1
are:
a. DoD CISO.
The DoD CISO:
(1) Directs and oversees the cybersecurity risk management of DoD information
technology and directs and coordinates the DoD Cybersecurity Program, which includes
establishing and maintaining the RMF.
(2) Advises and informs the PAOs and their representatives.
(3) Oversees the RMF TAG and the RMF KS.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 23
(4) Presents escalation procedures to resolve disputes among RMF processes and system
development, acquisition and sustainment processes, cyberspace operations, functional
operational processes, and assessments for DoD mission assurance, where necessary.
b. Risk Executive Function.
The Risk Executive Function consists of the DoD ISRMC supported by the DSAWG.
(1) DoD ISRMC:
(a) Provides strategic guidance to Levels 2 and 3, assesses Level 1 risk, and
authorizes information exchanges and connections for DoD enterprise systems, cross-mission
area systems, cross security domain connections, and mission partner connections.
(b) Performs the Risk Executive Function as described in DoDI 8500.01 and NIST
SP 800-39, and makes enterprise level risk acceptance determinations for authorized enterprise
systems, satisfying the requirements of cybersecurity reciprocity. If the DoD ISRMC accepts the
risk on behalf of the DoD Information Enterprise, the receiving organization may not refuse to
deploy the system.
(c) Identifies and manages enterprise level cybersecurity risks.
(d) Oversees cybersecurity risk guidance development for DoD business and mission
functions.
(e) Interfaces with the Mission Assurance Coordination Board regarding
cybersecurity risk, requirements, and implementation in accordance with DoDI 3020.45.
(2) The DSAWG, in support of the DoD ISRMC:
(a) Is the community forum for reviewing and resolving authorization issues related
to sharing community risk.
(b) Develops and provides guidance to the AOs for system connections to the DoD
Information Enterprise. AOs who disagree with DSAWG decisions may appeal to the DoD
ISRMC.
(3) Reference the RMF KS for additional processes needed for environment specific
requirements.
c. DoD Cybersecurity Architecture.
The DoD cybersecurity architecture represents the functions, relationships, and form of DoD
cybersecurity capabilities and is informed by the strategies, standards, and plans developed for
achieving an assured, integrated, and survivable information enterprise.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 24
d. RMF TAG.
The RMF TAG provides implementation guidance for the RMF by interfacing with the DoD
Component cybersecurity programs, cybersecurity communities of interest, and other entities,
such as the DSAWG, to address common issues across all entities. In doing so, the RMF TAG:
(1) Provides a detailed analysis and authoring support for the RMF KS.
(2) Recommends changes to security controls, security control baselines, and overlays in
DoD assignment values, and associated implementation guidance and assessment procedures to
the DoD CISO.
(3) Recommends changes to cybersecurity risk management processes to the DoD CISO.
(4) Advises DoD forums established to resolve RMF priorities and cross-cutting issues.
(5) Develops and manages automation requirements for DoD services that support the
RMF.
(6) Develops guidance for facilitating RMF reciprocity throughout the DoD.
(7) Implements updates of reference security control documents.
(8) Coordinates with privacy counterparts to manage privacy risks throughout the RMF
process when appropriate.
e. RMF KS.
The RMF KS:
(1) Is a dynamic online knowledge base that supports the RMF implementation,
planning, and execution by functioning as the authoritative source for RMF procedures and
guidance.
(2) Supports RMF practitioners by providing access to DoD security control baselines,
security control descriptions, security control overlays, and implementation guidance and
assessment procedures, all in accordance with CNSSI 1253, NIST SP 800-53, 800-53A, and 800-
53B.
(3) Supports the RMF TAG by enabling TAG functions and activities, including
maintaining membership, voting, analysis, authoring, and configuration control of RMF KS
enterprise content and functionality.
4.3. LEVEL 2 – MISSION OR BUSINESS PROCESSES.
The key governance elements and resources in Level 2 are:
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 25
a. JCA CPM.
(1) JCA CPMs:
(a) Provide recommendations and advice regarding capability requirements for
business mission functions in accordance with DoDD 7045.20.
(b) Under the direction of the DoD ISRMC, are responsible for recommending
cybersecurity risk requirements for their respective JCA.
(c) Supported by the Office of the DoD CIO and Joint Staff J-6, develop and
maintain cybersecurity risk guidance required by the RMF “Prepare” step for their JCA.
(2) The existing JCA structure will serve as the DoD’s common framework and lexicon
for organizing capability portfolios in accordance with DoDD 7045.20. Civilian and military
CPMs manage JCA capability portfolios. JCA CPMs may:
(a) Provide recommendations on the cybersecurity requirements for their respective
portfolios to the DoD ISRMC.
(b) Develop Level 2 prepare step guidance for systems within their area of
responsibility in accordance with NIST SP 800-37. Reference DoDD 7045.20, Enclosure 2,
Table 1 for JCA CPM lead officials.
b. PAO.
A PAO is appointed for each of the DoD MAs (e.g., warfighting MA, business MA,
enterprise information environment MA, and DoD portion of the intelligence MA) and their
representatives are DoD ISRMC members. The alignment of DoD MAs with RMF activities
promotes consideration of cybersecurity risk when conducting risk assessments for IT portfolio
management. PAOs:
(1) Represent the interests of their MA, in accordance with DoDD 8115.01 and, as
required, issue cybersecurity risk guidance specific to their MA, in accordance with this
issuance.
(2) Resolve authorization issues within their respective MAs and work with other PAOs
to resolve problems among MAs, as needed.
(3) Designate AOs for MA systems supporting MAs communities of interest specified in
DoDI 8320.07 in coordination with appropriate DoD Component heads, if required.
(4) Designate information security architects or systems security engineers for MA
segments or systems, as needed.
c. DoD Component CIO.
Each DoD Component CIO:
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 26
(1) Supported by the DoD Component CISO appointed in accordance with DoDI
8500.01, is responsible for:
(a) Administering the RMF within the DoD Component cybersecurity program.
(b) Participation in the RMF TAG.
(c) The visibility of, and sharing, the RMF status of assigned systems.
(d) Enforcing training requirements for persons participating in the RMF.
(2) Maintains visibility of assessment and authorization status of DoD Component
systems through automated assessment and authorization tools or designated repositories for
their Component to the DoD CIO and PAOs.
(3) Verifies an SO and/or PM is appointed in writing for each DoD Component system.
(4) Communicate organizational risk tolerance.
(5) Establish and maintain processes and procedures to manage DoD Component
POA&Ms.
(6) Appoint a DoD Component CISO to direct and coordinate the DoD Component
cybersecurity program.
(7) Review and document concurrence or non-concurrence, and provide directions as
merited, before ATOs are issued for DoD Component systems with a level risk of “Very High”
or “High.”
(8) Develop and implement the “Prepare” step guidance for their organizational
elements.
(9) Include performance of cybersecurity functions under the RMF, (e.g., AO, SCA,
ISSM) in the annual evaluation criteria.
d. DoD Component CISO.
DoD Component CISOs:
(1) Have authority and responsibility for security controls assessment and establish and
manage a coordinated security assessment process for systems governed by the DoD Component
cybersecurity program.
(2) Implement and enforce the RMF within the DoD Component cybersecurity program.
(3) Perform as the SCA or formally delegate the security control assessment role for
governed systems.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 27
(4) Track the assessment and authorization status of systems governed by the DoD
Component cybersecurity program.
(5) Establish and oversee a team of qualified cybersecurity professionals responsible for
conducting security assessments.
(a) CISOs may task, organize, staff, and centralize or direct assessment activities to
representatives as appropriate.
(b) Regardless of the adopted model, the CISO is responsible for assessing quality,
capacity, visibility, and effectiveness of security control assessments.
(6) Identify and recommend changes and improvements to the security assessment
process, security test and evaluation, and risk assessment methodology, including procedures,
risk factors, assessment approach, and analysis approach to the RMF TAG for inclusion in the
RMF KS.
(7) Advise AOs on the adequacy of acquisition program implementation of cybersecurity
requirements.
(8) Serve as the single cybersecurity coordination point for joint or DoD-wide programs
that deploy systems to DoD Component enclaves.
(9) Verify that DoD Component RMF guidance is posted to the DoD Component portion
of the RMF KS, and is consistent with this issuance and supporting guidance.
(10) Oversee DoD Component-level participation in the RMF TAG.
4.4. LEVEL 3 – SYSTEMS.
The key governance elements and resources in Level 3 are:
a. AOs.
DoD Component heads are responsible for appointing trained and qualified AOs for all DoD
systems within their Component. AOs should be appointed from senior leadership positions
within the business owner and mission owner organizations (as opposed to limiting appointments
to CIO organizations) to promote accountability in authorization decisions that balance mission
and business needs and security concerns. In addition to the responsibilities established in DoDI
8500.01, AOs:
(1) Comply with DoD ISRMC direction issued on behalf of the JCA CPMs.
(2) Initiate and complete all appropriate RMF tasks, with appropriate documentation, for
assigned systems.
(3) Monitor and track the overall execution of system-level POA&Ms.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 28
(4) Promote reciprocity as much as possible.
(5) Do not delegate authorization decisions. Other AO responsibilities and tasks may be
delegated to formally appointed and qualified AODRs.
(6) Review the security authorization documentation package in light of mission and
information environment indicators and determine a course of action provided to the responsible
CIO or CISO for reporting requirements described in FISMA. An AO may downgrade or revoke
an authorization decision at any time if risk conditions or concerns so warrant.
(7) Coordinate authorization activities and results with the system acquisition or
procurement representatives.
(8) Verify the system meets cyberspace operational commander requirements. When
risks are not fully mitigated, AOs inform operators of potential impacts.
(9) Verify the cyberspace and functional operational commanders have the necessary
cyber risk information on the system.
(10) When a cybersecurity risk affects an operational requirement, facilitate coordination
with:
(a) Cyberspace and functional operational commanders.
(b) Acquisition or procurement representatives.
(11) Verify that decisions:
(a) Incorporate the best cyber intelligence or commercial cyber threat information
available.
(b) Are recorded, tracked, and made available to all parties throughout the system’s
lifecycle.
b. System Cybersecurity Program.
The system cybersecurity program:
(1) Consists of the policies, procedures, and activities of the SO, PM, UR, ISSM, and
ISSO at the system level.
(2) Implements and executes policy and guidance from Levels 1 and 2 and augments
them as needed.
(3) Is responsible for establishing and maintaining system security, including monitoring
and reporting the system security status.
(4) SOs:
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 29
(a) In coordination with the IOs, data owners or stewards, categorize systems in
accordance with CNSSI 1253 and document the categorization in the appropriate Joint
Capabilities Integration and Development System capabilities document (e.g., capabilities
development document).
(b) Appoint a UR for assigned systems.
(c) Develop, maintain, and track the security plan for assigned systems (e.g.,
common security controls owner performs this function for inherited controls).
(d) Oversee and manage the system's cybersecurity posture, operations, and
sustainment activities (e.g., system patching, account management, updates, and required
maintenance) in accordance with the AO directions and approvals outlined in formal ATO
documentation.
(e) Document operations and sustainment activities delegated to external partners.
(5) PMs (or SO, if no PM is assigned):
(a) Appoint an ISSM for each assigned system with the support, authority, and
resources to satisfy the responsibilities established in this issuance.
(b) Verify each program acquiring a system has an assigned system security engineer
who is fully integrated into the systems engineering process.
(c) Implement the RMF for assigned systems.
(d) Verify that the planning and execution of all RMF activities are aligned,
integrated with, and supportive of the system acquisition process.
(e) Enforce AO authorization decisions for hosted or interconnected systems.
(f) Implement and assist the SO in maintaining and tracking the security plan for
assigned systems.
(g) Oversee POA&M development, monitoring, resolution, and resources.
(h) Oversee periodic reviews, testing, and assessment of assigned systems, conducted
at least annually.
(i) Provide the system description.
(j) Register the system in the DoD Component registry.
(k) Verify T&E of the assigned system includes planning, resourcing, and
documentation in the T&E master plan in accordance with applicable pathway policies and DoDI
5000.89.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 4: CYBERSECURITY RISK GOVERNANCE 30
(6) URs represent the operational and functional requirements of the user community in
the RMF process.
(7) ISSMs, in addition to the responsibilities established in DoDI 8500.01:
(a) Support implementing the RMF.
(b) Maintain and report systems assessment and authorization status and issues in
accordance with DoD Component guidance.
(c) Provide direction to the ISSO in accordance with DoDI 8500.01.
(d) Address issues affecting the organization’s overall security through coordination
with the SO, PM, ISSO, and UR, as appropriate.
4.5. RMF ROLE APPOINTMENT.
Table 8 identifies the appropriate authority for appointing RMF roles. Refer to the RMF KS for
additional guidance.
Table 8. Appointment of RMF Roles
Role
Appointed By
PAO
DoD MA owner
DoD CISO
DoD CIO
DoD Component CIO
DoD Component head
AO
DoD Component head; PAO for MA- managed information systems
AODR
AO
DoD Component CISO
DoD Component CIO or, in organizations in which the position of
DoD Component CIO does not exist, the DoD Component head.
SCA
DoD Component CISO is the Component SCA but may formally
delegate the SCA role as appropriate.
PM
DoD Component Acquisition Executive
ISSM
PM or SO
UR
ISO
RMF TAG Representative
DoD Component CISO
SO
DoD Component head
ISSO
PM or SO
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
SECTION 5: RMF KS 31
SECTION 5: RMF KS
5.1. OVERVIEW.
DoD RMF practitioners need access to RMF direction, standards, and tools to effectively and
efficiently apply the appropriate methods, standards, and practices required to protect DoD
information technology. RMF implementation must reflect the most up-to-date DoD intent on
evolving security objectives and risk conditions.
5.2. RMF KS.
The RMF KS was established as the web-based resource to serve as the authoritative source for
standardized implementation of RMF and the repository for DoD RMF policy and procedures.
a. The RMF KS:
(1) Serves as the authoritative source for providing direction, standards, and tools for
implementing and executing the RMF.
(2) Is available to all individuals with information technology risk management
responsibilities.
(3) Provides convenient access to security controls baselines, overlays, individual
security controls, and security control implementation guidance and assessment procedures.
(4) Supports automated and non-automated implementation of the RMF.
(5) Provides cybersecurity accountability information.
(6) Provides reciprocity guidance.
(7) Is accessible by individuals with a DoD public key infrastructure certificate (e.g.,
common access card), or external certification authority certificate in conjunction with DoD
sponsorship (e.g., for DoD contractors without a common access card and who work offsite).
(8) Hosts a library of tools, diagrams, process maps, documents, and other items to
support and aid in RMF execution.
(9) Serves as a collaborative workspace for the RMF user community to develop, share,
and post lessons learned, best practices, cybersecurity news and events, and other cybersecurity-
related information resources.
b. The RMF TAG is responsible for the functional configuration and content management of
the RMF KS and provides detailed analysis and authoring support for the enterprise portion of
the RMF KS content.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
GLOSSARY 32
GLOSSARY
G.1. ACRONYMS.
A
CRONYM
M
EANING
AO
authorizing official
AODR
authorizing official designated representative
ATO
authorization to operate
CIO
chief information officer
CISO
chief information security officer
CNSSI
Committee on National Security Systems Instruction
CPM
capability portfolio manager
CSF
cybersecurity framework
DISA
Defense Information Systems Agency
DoD ISRMC
DoD Information Security Risk Management Committee
DoDD
DoD directive
DoDI
DoD instruction
DOT&E
Director, Operational Test and Evaluation
DSAWG
Defense Security/Cybersecurity Authorization Working Group
DT&E
developmental test and evaluation
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014
IO
information owner
ISO
information security officer
ISSM
information system security manager
ISSO
information system security officer
JCA
Joint Capability Area
KS
knowledge service
MA
mission area
NIST
National Institute of Standards and Technology
OT&E
operational test and evaluation
PAO
principal authorizing official
PM
program manager
POA&M
plan of action and milestones
RMF
risk management framework (for DoD systems)
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
GLOSSARY 33
A
CRONYM
M
EANING
SCA
security control assessor
SO
system owner
SP
special publication
T&E
test and evaluation
TAG
Technical Advisory Group (RMF)
UR
user representative
USCYBERCOM
United States Cyber Command
USD(R&E)
Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
G.2. DEFINITIONS.
Unless otherwise noted, these terms and their definitions are for the purpose of this issuance.
T
ERM
D
EFINITION
ATO
Defined in NIST SP 800-39 under “Security Authorization (to
Operate).”
CSF
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
cyber risk
A measure of the extent to which an entity is threatened by a
potential circumstance or event in information technology.
cyber operational
risk
A measure of the extent to which an entity is threatened by a
potential circumstance or event in information technology relating to
routine function and activities of an organization.
cyberspace
operational risk
A measure of the extent to which an entity is threatened by a
potential circumstance or event in the interdependent network of
information technology infrastructures, and includes
telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded
processors and controllers.
cybersecurity risk
The probability of exposure, loss of critical assets and sensitive
information, or reputational harm as a result of a cyber-attack or
breach within an organization's network.
DoD Information
Enterprise
Defined in DoDD 8000.01.
enterprise architect
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
GLOSSARY 34
T
ERM
D
EFINITION
ISO
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
MA
Defined in United States Code, Title 40, Section 11331.
PM
Defined in NIST SP 800-39.
privacy architect
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
privacy engineer
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
security architect
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
Senior Accountable
Official for Risk
Management or Risk
Executive (Function)
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
system component
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
system element
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
system privacy
officer
Defined in NIST SP 800-37.
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
REFERENCES 35
REFERENCES
Committee on National Security Systems Instruction 1253, “Security Categorization and Control
Selection for National Security Systems,” current edition
Committee on National Security Systems Instruction 1254, “Risk Management Framework
Documentation, Data Element Standards, and Reciprocity Process for National Security
Systems,” August 2016.
Committee on National Security Systems Instruction 4009, “Committee on National Security
Systems (CNSS) Glossary,” March 2, 2022
Committee on National Security Systems Policy Number 12, “Cybersecurity Policy for Space
Systems Used to Support National Security Missions,” February 6, 2018
Committee on National Security Systems Policy Number 22, “Cybersecurity Risk Management
Policy,” September, 2021
DoD Directive 3020.04, “Order of Succession Pursuant to Executive Order 13533 and the
Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998,” August 25, 2010
DoD Directive 5000.01, “The Defense Acquisition System,” September 9, 2020
DoD Directive 5144.02, “DoD Chief Information Officer (DoD CIO),” November 21, 2014, as
amended
DoD Directive 7045.20, “Capability Portfolio Management,” September 25, 2008, as amended
DoD Directive 8000.01, “Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise
(DoD IE),” March 17, 2016, as amended
DoD Directive 8115.01, “Information Technology Portfolio Management,” October 10, 2005
DoD Directive 8140.01, “Cyberspace Workforce Management,” October 5, 2020
DoD Instruction 3020.45, “Mission Assurance (MA) Construct,” August 14, 2018
DoD Instruction 5000.02, “Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework,” January 23,
2020, as amended
DoD Instruction 5000.82, “Acquisition of Information Technology, “April 21, 2020
DoD Instruction 5000.83, “Technology and Program Protection to Maintain Technological
Advantage,” July 20, 2020, as amended
DoD Instruction 5000.89, “Test and Evaluation,” November 19, 2020
DoD Instruction 5000.90, “Cybersecurity for Acquisition Decision Authorities and Program
Managers,” December 31, 2020
DoD Instruction 8010.01, “Department of Defense Information Network (DODIN) Transport,”
September 10, 2018
DoD Instruction 8320.07, “Implementing the Sharing of Data, Information, and Information
Technology (IT) Services in the Department of Defense,” August 3, 2015, as amended
DoD Instruction 8500.01, “Cybersecurity,” March 14, 2014, as amended
DoD Instruction 8530.01, “Cybersecurity Activities Support to DoD Information Network
Operations,” March 7, 2016, as amended
DoD Instruction 8531.01, “DoD Vulnerability Management,” September 15, 2020
DoDI 8510.01, July 19, 2022
REFERENCES 36
Executive Order 13800, “Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical
Infrastructure,” May 11, 2017
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-30, “Guide for
Conducting Risk Assessments,” September 17, 2012
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-37, “Risk Management
Framework for Information Systems and Organizations: A System Life Cycle Approach for
Security and Privacy,” December 20, 2018
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-39, “Managing
Information Security Risk: Organization, Mission, and Information System View,” March
2011
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-53, “Security and
Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations,” December 10, 2020
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-53A, “Assessing
Security and Privacy Controls in Federal Information Systems and Organizations: Building
Effective Assessment Plans,” December 18, 2014
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-53B, “Control Baselines
for Information Systems and Organizations,” December 10, 2020
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-137, “Information
Security Continuous Monitoring (ISCM) for Federal Information Systems and
Organizations,” September 30, 2011
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-137A, “Assessing
Information Security Continuous Monitoring (ISCM) Programs: Developing and ISCM
Program Assessment,” May 21, 2020
Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M-14-03, “Enhancing the Security of Federal
Information and Information Systems,” November 18, 2013
United States Code, Title 10, Section 142
United States Code, Title 40, Section 11331
United States Code, Title 44, Chapter 35, Subchapter II (also known as the “Federal Information
Security Modernization Act of 2014”)