LEARNS Work Group:
Teacher Effectiveness
July 20, 2023
Meeting Norms
Prior to Meeting
DESE will send out agenda and materials at least 3 business days in advance of each
meeting.
Members review all materials and come prepared to share feedback.
During Meeting
Keep feedback centered on topic at hand.
Be mindful of how much “air time each member receives.
All ideas are valued.
Materials (notes, slides) will be posted after the meeting for members who can not attend.
Teacher Effectiveness Work Group Charge
This work group is focused on teacher effectiveness. LEARNS calls for updated policy
or guidance on:
Incentivizing teaching where we most need great teachers
The LEARNS-mandated Merit Teacher Incentive Fund
Celebrating and supporting great teachers and leaders
The use of teacher effectiveness data in personnel decisions
Value-added growth model calculations and reporting
Engagement from this group and other stakeholders is essential and ensures that policies and
guidance on teacher effectiveness are representative of perspectives from across the State’s education
system.
Agenda: July 20, 2023
Today the work group is focused on:
Celebrating and supporting great teachers and leaders
Use of teacher effectiveness data in personnel decisions
Review draft definition for outstanding growth
Review draft policy language on TESS and the use of student growth measures
Review key aspects of Arkansas’s value-added growth model’s methodology
Incentivizing teaching where we most need great teachers
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund framework for awards
Provide feedback on draft regulations.
Provide feedback on a updated model for awarding Merit Teacher Incentive Funds
Materials: July 20, 2023
Today, the work group will reference the following materials:
Incentivizing teaching where we most need great teachers
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund framework for awards
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund Framework and Model
Draft policy language on the Merit Teacher Incentive Fund
Celebrating and supporting great teachers and leaders
Use of teacher effectiveness data in personnel decisions
Draft policy language on TESS and the use of student growth
measures
Teacher Effectiveness Discussion
Legal Provisions: Teacher Effectiveness
The LEARNS Act requires that teacher effectiveness and, in some cases, value-added growth
model scores, serve as the basis for certain personnel decisions. This includes:
Reductions in force
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund eligibility
Eligibility to serve as a Literacy Coach
Student assignments in English language arts and mathematics
Teacher Effectiveness: Definition
Outstanding Performance Growth” means a teacher growth in the top quartile as
defined using the state approved growth model.
Teacher Effectiveness VAM Methodology
Arkansas’s value-added growth model is designed to answer the question: How
much did my student grow this year compared to how much we thought he/she would
grow based on what we know about his/her achievement in prior years (the student’s
score history)?
Teacher Effectiveness: Draft Policy
Please take three minutes to review the draft policy language on TESS and the use of student
growth measures
As you review the draft policy, consider the following discussion questions:
1. What information in rules should be further clarified?
2. Are there additional contexts that the rules should considered or specify?
3. What remaining questions are there?
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund Discussion
Legal Provisions: Merit Teacher Incentive Fund
Under the LEARNS Act the Merit Teacher Incentive Fund Program rewards eligible teachers with annual
bonuses of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) to teachers that have outstanding growth in student
performance, mentor teachers, teachers in residencies, and teachers instructing in critical shortage
areas.
Incentives are based on factors such as poverty levels, school performance ratings, and a teacher’s
status under the Teacher Excellence and Support System.
To reference the full statute see the appendix.
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund: Draft Policy
Please take three minutes to review the draft policy language on the Merit Teacher Incentive
Fund Program.
As you review the draft policy, consider the following discussion questions:
1. What information in rules should be further clarified?
2. What remaining questions are there?
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund Model
Please take three minutes to review the updated Merit Teacher Incentive Fund Scorecard and
Model. Then jot your thoughts on each proposed scenario on the following Jamboard.
This scorecard would be completed by teachers, verified by a district leader, and submitted to the
ADE for further verification and payment.
As you review the scorecard and models, consider the following discussion questions:
1. What are the pros and cons of each scenario?
2. What scenario for the release of funds would you advise? Why?
3. If a teacher is on intensive support plan for Science of Reading should they be included in merit
pay?
4. What remaining questions are there?
Appendix: LEARNS
Requirements
Teacher Effectiveness Framework (1 of 3)
To better align teachers’ summative ratings to requirements in LEARNS and to enable to use of value -
added growth model data in TESS, consider the following framework:
Evaluators must take student growth data into consideration when finalizing a teacher’s
summative rating.
Growth data must include value-added growth model data, when available, and may include other
sources of student performance data, as defined in ADE 005.16, Rules Governing Educator Support
and Development.
Teacher Effectiveness Framework (2 of 3)
When calculating an educator’s summative rating:
A teacher with value-added growth model data in the top quartile shall not receive a rating below
effective
A teacher with value-added growth model data in the bottom quartile shall not receive a highly
effective summative rating
Evaluators may use student growth data to:
Adjust the TESS summative evaluation designation within one level.
Example: An evaluator chooses to assign a rating of Highly Effective to a teacher whose observations
yielded a score of Effective but whose value-added growth model data is top quartile.
The evaluator may use other sources of growth data to establish a year of growth for students and to
inform any adjustment - within one level - of the teacher’s summative rating.
Teacher Effectiveness Framework (3 of 3)
In some cases, law specifies that teachers must achieve outstanding growth, which will be defined
as teachers who have received value-added growth data in the top-quartile. This is consistent with
student assignment provisions.
LEARNS Key Components for Kids
Unified early childhood system
Local early childhood lead organizations will build
plans to address the local early childhood needs
Arkansas will launch a new early childhood
accountability system
Early Literacy
Every K-3 student not reading proficiently will:
Have an individual reading plan
Receive targeted reading interventions
Be eligible for a $500 literacy tutoring grant
Third grade students not reading proficiently will
not advance to fourth grade
Numeracy
Students not yet proficient in math (grades 3 to
8) will receive individual math intervention plans
Tutoring
Arkansas high-dosage tutoring will be
piloted and scaled across the state
High school pathways
Students can graduate with career ready
diploma pathways
Student success plans start in 8th grade for
all students
Students can access any course through
course choice
Students participate in 75 hours of
community service to graduate
Students will receive college credit for AP, IB,
CLEP, etc courses
LEARNS Key Components for Schools
School Turnaround
Local school boards can contract with charter
school/others to run campuses at risk of state
takeover
Celebrate and support great teachers and
leaders
Minimum $50K salary
Bonuses of up to $10K for excellent teachers
12 weeks of paid maternity leave
Repeal the teacher fair dismissal act
School and district performance targets required
in superintendent contracts
Improved teacher training
Offer four year scholarships to cover tuition, fees,
and a teaching license exam
Literacy coaches for K-3 teachers
Train all teachers in crisis response, mental health
awareness, youth mental health first aid
Incentivize teaching where we most need great
teachers
Up to $6K in loan forgiveness for teachers in critical
shortage areas (up to three years)
Transportation
Modernize transportation for schools with
innovation grants
In 2022 one in 10 educators exited Arkansas’s
workforce.
Every student deserves to be taught by a talented,
committed educator, and every educator deserves
to be supported to grow in their profession.
L E A R N S
ACCOUNTABILITY
Celebrate and support great teachers and leaders
Minimum $50K salary and published salary schedule
Bonuses of up to $10K for excellent teachers
12 weeks of paid maternity leave
Repeal the teacher fair dismissal act and update key
personnel policies (e.g., reductions in force)
School and district performance targets required in
superintendent contracts
Improved teacher training
Offer four year scholarships to cover tuition, fees,
and a teaching license exam
One-year residencies with experienced mentors
Incentivize teaching where we most need great
teachers
Up to $6K in loan forgiveness for teachers in critical
shortage areas (up to three years)
LEARNS Act Requirements
Teacher Effectiveness
Merit Teacher Incentive Fund: Reward eligible teachers with annual bonuses of up to $10,000. Eligible teachers include those who demonstrate outstanding
growth, serve as mentors, or teach in a critical shortage area or subject. Value-added growth model must be included. Aspiring teachers participating in yearlong
residencies will also be eligible. This fund will replace the Incentives for Teacher Recruitment and Retention in High -Priority Districts fund.
Human Resources
The minimum base salary for full-time teachers will be $50,000. Base salaries will no longer increase by years of experience or for advanced degrees
All full-time school personnel will be eligible for up to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave, with half the cost paid by the state and districts agreeing to pay the other
half.
By 2023, school district superintendents will have school and district performance targets and school boards will submit superintendent contracts to the
commissioner of ADE.
School districts will hire school personnel including teachers and will make employment decisions based on performance, effectiveness, and qualifications.
Repeals the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act.
Educator Preparation
All teachers will participate in a one-year residency alongside a skilled mentor by 2027 (per LEARNS Executive Order).
Through the Teacher Academy Scholarship Program, students at eligible postsecondary institutions who enter the teaching profession and commit to teaching in
a critical shortage subject or geographical area can receive a scholarship to cover tuition and fees for up to four academic years and the cost of a teaching license
exam.
The State Teacher Education Program will provide a maximum of three years of loan forgiveness for teachers: $6,000 for licensed teachers who graduate from a
teacher education program and teach in a critical shortage area. This doubles the amounts previously provided under this prog ram.
Ensure the teaching profession in Arkansas is attractive
and competitive.
Waive initial licensing fees for first-time teachers: Recommend the State Board of Education
waive initial licensing fees for first-time teachers from May 1 to August 31, 2023.
Launch teacher residencies: Ensure all of Arkansas’s teacher candidates complete a one-year
teaching residency alongside a skilled mentor by 2027.
Update workforce management provisions: Support local school boards and
school districts as they update workforce management policies and practices.
Increase licensing transparency and efficiency: Make teacher certification processes more
efficient and transparent, ultimately saving time and money.
In the LEARNS Executive Order Report for Educator Workforce ADE committed to:
Legal Provisions: Merit Teacher Incentive Fund
The Merit Teacher Incentive Fund Program is hereby created to recognize and reward excellent teachers across
the State of Arkansas.
(b) A teacher deemed eligible under the program shall be rewarded with annual bonuses of no more
than ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
(c) The State Board of Education may promulgate rules for the implementation of this program,
including without limitation:
(1) The administration and methods of distribution of funds under the program;
(2) Eligibility requirements; and
(3) Timelines and processes for identifying eligible teachers.
Legal Provisions: Merit Teacher Incentive
Fund Eligibility
LEARNS defines eligibility for an award from the merit teacher incentive fund as:
(a) Eligibility for an award from the Merit Teacher Incentive Fund Program shall include without limitation:
(1)(A) A teacher who demonstrates outstanding growth in student performance, as determined by the Division of
Elementary and Secondary Education.
(2) Teachers serving as mentors to aspiring teachers;
(3) Aspiring teachers participating in yearlong residencies;
(4) Teachers instructing in subject areas or geographical areas identified as experiencing a critical shortage of
teachers, including public schools that have historically been understaffed, as determined by the division; and
(5) Other categories as defined by the state board.
(b) In determining distribution of funds to a teacher under this section, the division shall consider factors that include
without limitation:
(1) The poverty level of the school as factored under § 6-17-413; and
(2) The designated performance rating of the school under the school rating system, § 6-15-2101 et seq.
(c) A teacher who is given intensive support status under the Teacher Excellence and Support System,
§ 6-17-2801 et seq., is ineligible for receipt of funds under the program for the school year.
LEARNS Background: Value-Added Growth
Model
LEARNS requires:
In determining whether a teacher has demonstrated outstanding growth in student performance, the
division shall calculate a value-added growth model score for grades and subjects, where possible.
(ii) The division shall develop rules to establish the process and procedure for public school
districts to annually report data related to value-added models that includes without limitation:
(a) Student test scores; and
(b) Prior student performance by subject and school
LEARNS Background: Value-Added Growth
Model
LEARNS requires:
That as part of math and literacy intervention plans students who are not performing at or above grade
level must be assigned to a teacher with a value-added model score in the top quartile statewide in
math/ELA for the previous three (3) years or, if a public school district or open-enrollment public charter
school is unable to find a teacher with a value-added model score in the top quartile statewide in math
for the previous three (3) years, assignment to teacher: then the student may be assigned to a teacher
with a highly-effective rating or with a Master Professional Educator designation;