University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska - Lincoln
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Winter 6-12-2023
INFLUENCE OF LIBRARIANS ATTITUDE TOWARD CATALOGUING INFLUENCE OF LIBRARIANS ATTITUDE TOWARD CATALOGUING
AND CLASSIFICATION IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES AND CLASSIFICATION IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES
Fajiwe Olabode Thomas
Subair Roselyn E
Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State
Enamudu Augustine I
Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State
Omonagbe C. O
Afe Babalola University, Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti State
Ogungbemile A. E
Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac
Part of the Scholarly Communication Commons
Olabode Thomas, Fajiwe; E, Subair Roselyn; I, Enamudu Augustine; O, Omonagbe C.; and E, Ogungbemile
A., "INFLUENCE OF LIBRARIANS ATTITUDE TOWARD CATALOGUING AND CLASSIFICATION IN ACADEMIC
LIBRARIES" (2023).
Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal)
. 7795.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7795
INFLUENCE OF LIBRARIANS ATTITUDE TOWARD CATALOGUING AND
CLASSIFICATION IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES
By
Fajiwe, O. T;
Subair, R. E;
Enamudu A.I;
Omonagbe, C.O;
&
Ogungbemile, A.E.
University Library, Afe Babalola University, P.M.B.5454, Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State.
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of librarians’ attitude toward cataloguing and classification
in academic libraries. Academic library is the heartbeat of a higher institution of learning.
Without an academic library, students, researchers, staff might find it very difficult to study and
conduct effective and efficient research. All information resources in academic libraries are
expected to be catalogued and classified by librarians/cataloguers with standard classification
schemes which would bring all the related books together. The attitude of librarians toward
cataloguing and classification can be positive or negative. Positive in the essence that they tend
to enjoy or like cataloguing and classification, understand its value, and have confidence in it.
However, librarians with a negative attitude toward cataloguing and classification tend to
dislike it, and feel afraid to engage in it. The attitude of librarians toward cataloguing and
classification would be determined whether the library information resources in the academic
libraries would be catalogued or not. If librarians develop a positive attitude toward cataloguing
and classification, all the library information resources in an academic library would be
catalogued, classified, organized, arranged and shelved in order for the library users to make
use of them. But if librarians develop a negative attitude toward cataloguing and classification,
some of library information resources might not be catalogued or wrongly catalogued where
they would not be useful for the users.
Keywords: Attitude, Academic library, Librarian, catalogue, cataloguing and classification
Introduction
Academic library as the name implies, is the library that can be found in higher institutions of
learning such as colleges of education, Polytechnics and Universities Ubogu and Okiy (2011).
According to David-West and Wali (2020), academic libraries are established in higher
institutions of learning with the main purpose of supporting and complementing the institution's
personnel's information needs, be it on academic, political, economic, socio-cultural,
technological, etc. According to Agyen-Gyasi, Lamptey and Frempong (2010), academic
libraries are essential contributors to knowledge generation and serve a wide spectrum of
knowledge seekers. Academic libraries serve two complementary purposes: to support the
school’s curriculum and to support the research of the university faculty and students (Adenira,
2011). Academic institutions play a key role in society by preparing future generations to use the
acquired knowledge to fulfill their responsibilities more effectively. Academic libraries serve
users such as students, faculty, administrators and staff with diverse information needs.
Librarians and their Responsibilities
A librarian is a professional trained in the field of library and information science that is in charge
of a library and is responsible for its management and services. They render quality services to
the library users to ensure that their information needs are met. The librarian takes care of the
library and its resources. They oversee the daily operations of a library at the public or private
level. They are responsible for acquiring, organizing, managing and distributing library resources
and ensuring that library provision meets the needs of all its users. According to Al-Qallaf
(2006), librarians provide access to eclectic e-collections, create and maintain digital content,
support e-learning, provide real time e-reference, negotiate contracts and licensing agreements
and struggle with the economics of electronic information. Librarians’ help library users find
information and conduct research for personal and professional use. They can also help students
learn how to use the library database to find online scholarly articles or hardcopy materials for
research papers, projects, dissertation and thesis. Abram (2008) states that a librarian must have
solid knowledge about user behavior. Stephens (2007) created a model of the key skills of a
pragmatic blogging librarian such as monitoring, gathering, reflecting, sharing, commenting and
creating communities.
In the era of technological development, librarians are expected to be very much updated on
technological changes. Modern era librarians are expected to make greater use of emerging
technologies in the library management and services to make it more popular and useful among
the patrons. Modern era librarians are expected to help patrons dive in the oceans of information
available in books and digital records.
In addition to the responsibilities of librarians, the following are also part of their job:
Answering readers’ enquiries;
Developing, cataloguing and classifying library resources;
Ensuring that library services meet the needs of particular groups of users (e.g undergraduate,
researchers, staff, postgraduate students, disabled students);
Train and supervise library technicians, assistants, other support staff and volunteers;
Organize library materials so that they are easy to find.
Cataloguer
A cataloguer is a professional librarian who classifies library materials e.g books according to a
categorical system. He/she responsible for the processes of description, subject analysis,
classification and authority control of library materials. Bahmann (2007) described cataloguers
as professional librarians, sizable in number but indispensable in providing important but veiled
services to libraries and library users. According to Aina (2012) the tasks of a cataloguer are
multifarious; they need to possess technical knowledge and subjects that will enable them to
perform their task. Crosby (2001) affirmed that the work of cataloguers has changed and
expanded. According to her, cataloguers classify books, videos, CD-ROMS, and other materials
so as to enable users to find what they are looking for. The primary duties of a cataloguer are to
prepare bibliographic records and provide access and retrieval of items in the library. The work
of a cataloguer requires dedication and skillful use of the various tools to teach in order to have a
complete knowledge of the profession that can easily link the users of the library to the needed
available resources in a particular library. Yusuf (2012) states that cataloguers are expected to
provide effective and efficient services that will enhance information retrieval and increase the
use of library resources. According to him, it may be difficult to achieve if the cataloguers do not
possess sufficient knowledge and skill since there will not be a good connection between users
and the library collections. Bello and Mansor (2011) strongly believed that a cataloguer must be
skilled enough to perform bibliographic description in all kinds of resources with the use of
appropriate bibliographic tools such that users could easily and efficiently access the resources in
the library irrespective of the method used whether manually or technologically.
As cataloguers have the responsibility to facilitate patron access to information resources, these
tasks cannot be done without following specific rules provided by: Anglo American Cataloguing
Rules (AACR) and Machine Readable Cataloguing Standards (MARC). The knowledge of these
cataloguing rules and skills in the use of LCC, LCSH DDC as the case may be will ever be
relevant in academic libraries. Cataloguer is expected to check punctuation, uniformity with
existing records and authorities and access points. A good cataloguer will not just copy a
catalogue without reviewing the records because records that are perfect at an instance are hard
to find. Apart from importing records, a cataloguer creates electronic reading lists, makes
decisions regarding terminology in order to create appropriate locations for the various items
such that searching the catalogue becomes easier for the use of DVDs, CDs, books on tape,
electronic documents, reference materials, books, magazines and indigenous publications using
cataloguing tools with his/her sharpened pencil and eraser.
A seasoned cataloguer ensures that the author and title are correct, look through the book, turn to
bibliographic tools and provide the best, most accurate record. Attention to details is the
hallmark of an exceptional cataloguer because he or she knows that accurate bibliographic
records and improved access is a good advertisement for the library. However, regular training
and conferences attendance will help cataloguers keep abreast of changing cataloguing rules and
tools.
Cataloguing
Cataloguing is the process of describing information resources uniquely based on some unique
properties such as the author, the title, the place of publication, the date of publication and the
publishers. The place of publication, the date of publication and the publishers are usually
referred to as “imprint’. According to Akidi & Omekwu (2019), cataloguing is the systematic
description of a book, pointing out the important bibliographic details such as author, title, sub-
title, parallel title, edition, publisher and place of publication, date of publication, series, subject
and collation. Esse (2013) described cataloguing as simply the bibliographic description of
documents by means of different classification procedures and rules. Ugwanna (2013) defines
cataloguing as the process of preparing catalogue entries for all materials that are available in
the library. It includes identifying the author, title, publication information and determines the
main entry, added entries, subject headings and call number. Cataloguing shows vividly the
bibliographic details of materials in such a way that a user can easily identify them with ease,
even when there is no help coming from a staff (librarian).
The main purpose of cataloguing is:
1. To enable users to find a book of which either the author or the title or the subject is
known.
2. To assist in the choice of a book as to its edition (bibliographical) and as to its character
(literary or topical).
3. To show what the library has by a given author, on a given subject or in a given kind of
literature.
4. To show what library has where it is located (on display, in store, on loan) and what
stories it tells.
Steps and Processes of Cataloguing
Cataloguing can be grouped into two:
1. Original cataloguing: This is used when copy catalog information is not available for an
item. In this case, the cataloguer /librarian does all of the cataloging from scratch. Original
cataloguing involves creation of bibliographic records without making reference to other records
prepared by another cataloguer elsewhere. Correct original cataloguing is a complicated and
time-consuming process that is bound by many rules. The primary source for original
cataloguing is a publication called AACR2 or Anglo American Cataloging Rules, 2nd Edition.
The rules advise cataloguers how to create a catalogue record, how to select and record
information about an item’s title, author, publishers, edition and so on.
2. Copying cataloguing: It is an alternative to original cataloguing. Copy cataloging is the
process of editing a pre-existing bibliographic record instead of creating a completely new record
from scratch. It can also mean finding a matching existing cataloguing record (bibliographic
record) for an item in hand, editing and incorporating the record as necessary and attaching the
local holding information to the bibliographic record. Copy cataloguing is the preparation of
bibliographic records with already prepared records by another person in another library. This
involves the use of Machine Readable MARC standard format. Some of the sources of copying
cataloguing are WorldCat, Library of congress, British online, Online Computer Library Centres
(OCLC), etc
Original cataloguing can be divided into two, namely:
i. Descriptive cataloguing: This is the process of identifying and describing the
bibliographic and physical form of an item, determining the author(s)/editor(s), title, place of
publication, publisher, year of publication, pagination, ISBN/ISSN and physical description, that
will be used as access points, and recording these data in a bibliographic record. Descriptive
cataloging enables the user to find and identify a book, by the name of the author, the title,
variant titles, etc. Two popular standards for descriptive cataloging are Anglo-American
Cataloging Rules (AACR) and its successor Resource Description and Access (RDA).
ii. Subject cataloguing: This is the aspect of cataloguing which focuses on the subject
content of a book or information material. Subject cataloguing encompasses classification and
assignment of subject headings for the information items. Subject cataloguing is “any catalogue
arranged by subjects, whether in alphabetical or classified order.” Harrods Librarian’s Glossary
and Reference Book. Subject cataloguing is “that part of cataloguing which involves the
allocation of subject headings to entries for specific books or other documents.” According to
Miller (2004), subject cataloguing deals with what a book or other library item is about, and the
purpose of subject cataloguing is to list under one uniform word or phrase all the materials on a
given topic that a library has in its collection. By doing so, if a person is looking for information
on a particular topic; he is able to get it through the subject headings approach. All forms of
subject catalogues have a two-fold objective: first to enable an enquirer to identify documents on
a given subject and second, to make known the presence of material on allied or related subjects.
A library having a million volumes that are not organized for easy retrieval will be judged as
having nothing. Nwalo (2003) observes that a building filled with books is not necessarily a
library unless those books have been organized for access and made available for use. Joni
(1995) avers that when a library has invested so much money to purchase books and other
research materials, cataloguing is a small price to pay to be able to find them when they are
needed. When resources are acquired in the library, they are arranged in specific patterns so that
users can access them easily.
Classification
Classification is the process of arranging, grouping, coding, and organizing books and other
library materials (e.g. books, serials, sound recordings, moving images, cartographic materials,
manuscripts, computer files, e-resources etc.) on shelves or entries of a catalogue, bibliography
and index according to their subject in a systematic, logical and helpful order by way of
assigning them call numbers using a library classification system so that users can find them as
quickly and easily as possible. Ode and Omokaro, (2007) defined classification as simply a
consortium of liked things and sorting out things according to their differences. According to
Opaleke, Olayemi, and Aina (2006) classification is a necessary device in organization. It directs
the users to a specific subject and groups books on the same or related subjects. Thus, book
classification refers to two basic processes: the making of a classification scheme and people
who perform this activity are known as classificationists. Classification is done with a view to
assign class marks to books using schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification (LC),
Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Moys Classification scheme and others.
Purposes of Classification
1. It brings related information items together, that is, it brings like/ the same books
together.
2. It enables clientele to locate and retrieve information materials as quick as possible
3. It helps in compilation of subject bibliography
4. It reveals the weakness and strength of library collections. It shows which subjects have a
good collection and which subject require more attention
5. It saves time
Components of Classification Schemes
1. Schedule: Schedule is used to describe the printed list of all the main classes, divisions
and subdivisions of the classification scheme. They provide a logical arrangement of all the
subjects encompassed by the classification scheme.
2. Notation: Notation is the system of symbols used to represent the terms encompassed by
the classification scheme. The notation can be pure using one type of symbol only or mixed
using more than one kind of symbol. A pure notation would normally involve only letters of the
alphabet or only numerals. A mixed notation would normally utilize both letters and numerals.
3. Index: The Index to the classification scheme is an alphabetical list of all the subjects
encompassed by the scheme, with the relevant class mark shown against each subject.
Principles of Cataloguing and Classification
1. Convenience of the user: Library should be arranged and organized in such a way that
users would be able to access library materials conveniently.
2. Consistency and standardization: the tools used in cataloguing library materials must
be uniform all through. If the cataloguer is using the library of congress, he/she must be
consistent with it.
3. Representation: Every information resource acquired by the library must be represented
by one catalogue entry either by author, or little or subject.
4. Common usage: The formation resources in an academic library should be properly
arranged in such a way that when a user enters, he/she should be able to locate, retrieve and use
those resources with little or no stress.
5. Rationality: The rules in a cataloguing code should be defensible and not arbitrary.
Cataloguing and Classification Tools
Cataloguing tools are equipment used by cataloguers for the purpose of information retrieval.
They are used in cataloguing and classification activities, and in encoding bibliographic
information into the library catalogues. Manaf, Nadzar and Ibrahim (2009) define cataloguing
tools as authoritative rules, codes, guidelines that are acceptable and used by the communities of
practice, and regarded as essential to attain accuracy and consistency in the creation of a
catalogue record. Some of the cataloguing tools are:
- Classification schemes
- Subject headings
- Subject/ classification schedules
- Anglo American Cataloguing Rules 2
nd
(AACR2)
- Worksheet
- Cutter table
- Pencils and erasers, etc.
Classification schemes are the main tools used in classifying information resources in the library.
They are systematically listed terms or notions representing subject disciplines and sub-
disciplines. They are useful for the organization of library resources for easy and quick access.
Types of classification schemes
There are several classification schemes used in cataloguing and classified information resources
in the library. Some of them are:
1. Colon Classification (CC)
2. Moy’s Classification Schemes (MC) for classifying law books
3. Universal Decimal Classification (UDC)
4. Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC)
5. Bernard Classification Scheme (BCS) for classifying medical books
6. Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)
7. Universal Decimal Classification (UDC).
All the classification schemes are very important in cataloguing and classifying library
information resources, but the one commonly used in academic libraries is the Library of
Congress classification schemes.
Library of Congress Classification Schemes
The Library of Congress Classification was developed for the Library of Congress, beginning in
1897, by James Hanson (chief of the Catalog Department) and his assistant Charles Martel.
Library of Congress Classification is an enumerative system of library classification which
classifies by discipline, i.e. a system that lists numbers for single, compound, as well as complex
subjects. It has been adopted by other libraries all over the world, particularly academic and
research libraries. Main classes of LCC represent major disciplines which are divided into
subclasses which are further divided into divisions. Such a categorization creates a hierarchical
display for LCC, progressing from the general to the specific.
LCC divides the entire field of knowledge into 21 main classes, each identified by a single
capital letter of the alphabet. The letters I, O, W, X, Y have not been assigned subject areas but
could be used for future expansion.
A - General Works
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion
C - History Auxiliary Sciences
D - World History and History of Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, New Zealand,
etc.
E - History of the Americas (General U.S History)
F - History of the Americas ( Local & Latin America)
G - Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
H - Social Sciences
J - Political Science
K - Law
L - Education
M - Music
N - Fine Arts
P - Language and Literature
Q - Science
R - Medicine
S - Agriculture
T - Technology and Home Economics
U - Military Science
V - Naval Science
Z - Bibliography and Library Science
Some of the classes above can be broken down into various disciplines. For examples
Q Science
QA - Mathematics/Computer sciences
QB - Astronomy
QC - Physics
QD - Chemistry
QE - Geology
Worksheet for cataloguing a book is illustrated below:
Resources Types: …………………………………………………………………………….........
Authors/Editors: ………………………………………………………………………………….
Title: ……………………………………………………………………………………………….
Edition: ………………………………………………………………………………………........
Place of Publication: ……………………………………………………………………………
Publisher: ………………………………………………………………………………………….
Year of Publication: ………………………………………………………………………………
Collation (pagination): …………………………………………………………………………...
Series: ……………………………………………………………………………………………...
ISBN/ISSN: ………………………………………………………………………………………..
Barcode: . ………………………………………………………………………………………….
Classification: ……………………………………………………………………………………
Subject: …………………………………………………………………………………………...
Note: ……………………………………………………………………………………………….
Call Mark/Call Number
Each book on the shelf in academic libraries are provided with a call mark built on the Library of
Congress (LC) Scheme. The call mark of any book is made up of letters representing the broad
subject area covered by the book and a series of Arabic numerals and a combination of such
letters and numbers for LC only. For example, a book with call mark built on the Library of
Congress (LC) Scheme reads as follows:-
Book
Fajiwe, O.T
Principles of Physics
2
nd
ed.
Ibadan
Olabode Thomas (Nigeria Publishers) Ltd
xxi, 243p.: ill.; 23cm
978-978-366-997-6
QC 21.3 .F33 2023
Physics
Includes references and index
Library of Congress
Call Mark: QC - represents broad subject areas
21.3 - further narrows down the subject areas
.F33 - the cutter numbers for the first word in the author’s name.
With the call mark, one can proceed to the shelf and locate the book easily if the book is on the
shelf. The user can still be assisted further in locating books on the shelf with the help of a guide
(shelf guide) usually pasted on the shelf.
Attitude of Librarians toward Cataloguing and Classification
Attitude is a tendency for individuals who organize thoughts, emotions and behaviors towards a
psychological object. Attitude can be categorized as bi-dimensional (person’s emotions and
beliefs) or multidimensional (affect, behavior, and cognition). Human beings are not born with
attitudes; they learn them afterwards. Some attitudes are based on people’s own experiences,
knowledge and skills, and some are gained from other sources. People with positive attitudes can
remain hopeful and see the best even in difficult situations. Positive attitudes are necessary for
any successful and significant achievement. Ojebode (2004) asserted that attitudes are best
expressed when individuals make statements about their feelings or opinions about certain
objects, issues or things. Nwosu (2014) reported that the development of three principles,
requiring ability, aptitude, and attitude, that guide cataloguers in acquiring competences and
skills and essentially engaging in continuing education will position cataloguers to cope with the
challenges inherent in cataloguing practices. This implies that a cataloguer must be very
knowledgeable.
Cataloguing and classification are core tenant of librarianship, has at its heart the goal of making
library materials more accessible to the users (Adeoye, et al, 2016). Librarians’ attitude toward
cataloguing and classification can be referred to as positive, negative, or neutral feelings and
dispositions. Librarian with a positive attitude toward cataloguing and classification tend to
enjoy or like it, understand its value, and have confidence in it. However, librarians with a
negative attitude toward cataloguing and classification tend to dislike it, and feel afraid to engage
in it. They belief that cataloguing and classification is a brain - tasking, time consuming and
meticulous job (Idiegbeyanose, 2013). Some of these librarians are always in a hurry to leave the
cataloguing and classification unit when they are posted there, even when corrected, they are not
bordered, no sign of seriousness and commitment in them. They also belief that cataloguing and
classification require rules and regulations coupled with the use of accurate punctuation marks
which might be very difficult for them to learn and therefore lead to their negative attitude
toward it. Isiyaku, Bello & Ado (2018) investigated the challenges and prospects of cataloguing
and classification. The study identified that librarians are no longer interested in cataloguing and
classification units due to its tedious nature, very boring, difficult and time consuming.
Librarians are expected to develop positive attitude toward cataloguing and classification in
order to place information materials needed in the hands of the users without wasting their time
(Yusuf, 2012). The Cataloguing section requires maximum concentration and tacit knowledge.
David-West & Angrey (2018) explained that cataloguing and classification skills are major tools
in information dissemination because it is an access and retrieval tool which allows people to
find information needed for their research work and personal development. Positive attitude are
necessary for any successful and significant achievement. Positive attitude stimulates librarians
to make an effort and leads to high achievement in that cataloging and classification. Therefore,
when librarians develop a positive attitude toward cataloguing and classification, success can be
achieved.
Conclusion
Attitudes are the best predictor for estimation of librarians’ success in cataloguing and
classification. The attitudes toward cataloguing and classification by librarians change with
exposure to cataloguing and classification, but that the direction of change may be related to the
quality of that exposure. A positive attitude leads to happiness and success, and can change the
entire life of librarians from their erroneous belief that cataloguing and classification is very
difficult and not interesting.
References
Abram, S (2008). Social libraries. The librarian 2.0 phenomenon. library resources and technical
services 52(2), 19-22.
Adedibu, I. A. et al (2009). The State of disaster preparedness in fourteen libraries in Kwara
State, Nigeria. Nigerian Libraries 42:45-57.
Adeoye, M.O, Olusola, A. M., Oladapo Y.O. and Adegun, A.I. (2016). Effects of Cataloguing
and Classification Schemes on the Organization of Knowledge in Medical Libraries.
International Journal of Library & Educational Science (IASET: IJLES) 2,(1), pp 9-20.
Adeniran, P. (2011). User satisfaction with academic library services: Academic staff and
students’ perspectives. International Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.3
(10), 209-216.
Agyen-Gyasi, K, Lamptey, R. and Frempong, A. (2010) Academic librarians’ role in
maximizing library use in Ghana. dspace.knust.edu.gh:8080
Aina, L.O. (2012). Mentoring in cataloguing bridging the gap between the young and adult.
Papers presented at the 32nd annual seminar/ workshop organized by Nigerian Library
Association, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing Section from Oct-2-26-, 2012.
Akidi, O.J, & Omekwu, C.O.(2019). Assessment of cataloguing and classification practices of
the National Library of Nigeria in the digital age: A bibliographic control perspective.
International Journal of Library and Information Science. Retrieved from
doi:10.34218/ijilis.8.1.2019.003.
Al Qallaf C.L (2006). Librarians and technology in academic and research
libraries in Kuwait: perceptions and effects. Libri, 56,168-179.
Bothmann, R.L. (2007). Meeting the needs of special format cataloguers: ideas for professional
organizations, library schools and professional cataloguers. Cataloguing and
Classification Quarterly, 44(3/4): 221-232.
Bello M. A & Mansor Y. (2011). Cataloguer mentoring, survey of cataloguer perception
in mentoring for skills development in academic libraries. Asia-pacific conference.
David-West, B. T., & Wali, N. (2020). Students’ attitude towards cataloguing and classification
in the University of Port Harcourt: A case study of student’s industrial work experience
scheme(SIWES). Research Journal of Library and Information Science, 4(2), 22-28.
David-West, B.T.& Angrey, C. U. (2018). Cataloguing and classification skills and information
dissemination in libraries. Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(7) 94-97
Esse, U. C. (2013). Current trends in cataloguing and the challenges of a cataloguer in the
digital age. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, no. 2: 16- 23.
Idiegbeyan-ose, J & Ilo, P. (2013). Libraries & librarians in the 21ist century: A new perspective.
African Journal of information& knowledge management,.Vol1(1).pp.68-74.
Isiyaku, M. Bello, B.B, Ado, G. (2018). Cataloguing and classification a library material in
libraries of Kano State, North West Nigeria. Challenges and prospects. International
Journal of Advanced Academic Research Arts Humanities and Education, 4(7), 2488
2489.
Joni, L.C. (1995). The electronic card catalogue. New Jersey Law Journal 13(3), 5-9
Majid, S. and Abdoulaye, K. (2000). Use of the Internet for reference services in Malaysian
academic libraries. Online Information Review, 24.5.
Manaf, Z., Nadzar, F. & Ibrahim, I. (2009). Assessing the cataloguing practices in libraries of
private colleges in Sarawak. Malaysia: University Teknologi Mara. Retrieved from
http//:www.irdc.uitm.edu.
Nwalo, K.I.N. (2003) Fundamentals of library practice: a Manual on Library Routines. lbadan:
Stirling-Harden.
Ode, E.O. & Omakaro, D.A. (2007). Basic principles and practice of librarianship. PSGFrance
publications.
Ojebode, E.I. (2004). Investigating attitudes of vocational and technical education students on
the use of library resources. Nigerian Library and Information science 22.2:50.
Opaleke, J. S., Olayemi T. K., & Aina, R. (2006). School library management for teacher
librarian. Ilorin: Nathadex publishers
Stephens, M. (2007). Modeling the role of blogging in librarianship. Texas: University of
North Texas.
Ubogu, J. O. and Okiy, R. B (2011). Sources of funds in academic libraries in Delta State,
Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practicehttp: //unlib.unl.edu/LPP/
Ugwunwa, C.E. (2013). Current trends in cataloguing and the challenges of a cataloguer in the
digital age. Journal of Information Knowledge Management, vol 4, 2.
Yusuf K. F. (2012). Preparedness of cataloguing section for library automation in academic
libraries in Lagos state, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 3(2),
119- 125.