2
such as for not wearing a seat belt.
5
Other than that, you can make it clear that you are
exercising your rights to remain silent and not to identify yourself.
• If you are a passenger in a car that gets pulled over, keep your seat belt on during the
stop, even if the car is not in motion. If the police notice that you do not have your seatbelt
on, they may assume that you were not wearing your seatbelt when the car was in motion
and issue a citation for violating the Massachusetts seatbelt law. At that point, they may
ask for your identification in order to issue the citation.
6
• Do NOT lie or provide any false information or identification to the police because that
may give rise to reasonable suspicion that you have committed a crime and lead to your
arrest.
7
If you are a pedestrian stopped by the police
• If you are a pedestrian and you are stopped and asked to identify yourself to the police,
you do not have to give your name. You are free to decline. You can ask the police officer
why you are being questioned, if you are free to leave, and whether you are under arrest.
8
If you are not under arrest and otherwise free to leave, you can walk away.
• It is important that you remain calm if you are approached by an officer. If you choose to
exercise your right to walk away, it may be best to avoid running or to otherwise draw
more attention to yourself. Suspicious behavior may give the police the right to detain or
question you more.
9
5
While a police officer generally may not require a passenger to identify themselves, the SJC has held that an officer may
lawfully demand identification if she has probable cause to issue a warning or citation to a passenger for violating Massachusetts
seat belt law. Commonwealth v. Washington, 459 Mass. at 38 (“[a] police officer . . . may make such a demand if he intends to
issue a citation for a seat belt law violation and has a valid basis to do so”). Because the person in that case did provide his name
when asked, the court did not reach the question of whether a passenger who refuses to identify himself can be charged with a
separate crime. In the absence of any state statute saying those being cited for a violation of law must provide their name or
address, you may be within your rights not to identify yourself, consistent with one’s right to remain silent (but not to give false
identity information) when under arrest. But the law is unclear, so it is best to avoid being put in this situation by keeping on
your seat belt.
6
See footnote 5.
7
See Commonwealth v. Goewey, 452 Mass. 399, 407 (2008) (“[a] passenger's being unable to produce some form of identification
may not, by itself, be suspicious; but the production of an apparently false identification is”).
8
There is no Massachusetts law requiring a pedestrian who is approached by a police officer and is asked to identify themselves
to do so. See also Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497-498 (1983) (“law enforcement officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment
by merely approaching an individual on the street or in another public place, by asking him if he is willing to answer some
questions . . . [t]he person approached, however, need not answer any question put to him; indeed, he may decline to listen to the
questions at all and may go on his way”).
9
See Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 120 (2000) (citing Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 498 (1983)) (“an individual, when
approached, has a right to ignore the police and go about his business. Unprovoked flight is the exact opposite of ‘going about
one's business.’ While flight is not necessarily indicative of ongoing criminal activity, Terry recognized that officers can detain
individuals to resolve ambiguities in their conduct, 392 U.S., at 30, 88 S.Ct. 1868, and thus accepts the risk that officers may stop
innocent people. If they do not learn facts rising to the level of probable cause, an individual must be allowed to go on his way”).