Copyright © 2007–2018 Tim Ferriss. All Rights Reserved.
lot of intelligent people trying to get into this
building/magazine/party house. And those people train each other
really, I wouldn’t quite say viciously, but really rigorously about
comedy. "This joke doesn't progress. This joke is predictable." And
it's very rare that you'll get 19 year olds being hard on funny 18
year olds year after year.
And so I think that is a training system that is unlike just about
anything else you'd be exposed to at that age. So that has led to a
lot of people falling in love with and becoming very good at
comedy writing which is a real a building block of entertainment
that can be put to use – so a lot of people have traditionally
graduated "The Harvard Lampoon" and gone on to write for "The
Simpsons" or "Saturday Night Live," or many, many other shows.
And I think once you see graduates do that, you think, "Oh, maybe
I could do that." But a big advantage, I think, of going to a fancy
school or my dad – who did not go to a fancy school but is a writer
– a lot of people ask me, "Oh, did you have those advantages?"
Yes, of course, to an extent, but I find the biggest advantage is just
not thinking that it's a crazy idea to try to be a comedy writer or to
try to be a writer.
Many people waste years working as a lawyer, working whatever
they do that they think of as a more reasonable choice before they
finally get the courage to write. So I think that the huge advantage
is, if you have the talent – no matter where you are – if you believe
that it's a reasonable choice of action, you're extremely fortunate.
And that, I think, is a main advantage of going to Harvard – it
doesn't seem crazy.
Tim Ferriss: Right. You have these historical case studies of people who have
done exactly what you might fantasize about doing. And the rigor
and the training is very interesting to me because I was the
graphics editor at "The Princeton Tiger," so the satire magazine –
cartoons, illustrations – that was my department and I wanted that
job partially because Jim Lee, who is an iconic hero in the comic
book world for me, had that previous post at Princeton.
And I found a bunch of his drawings, actually, that he did when he
was shitfaced drunk after going to a party on Nassau Street, but
that's a separate story. The approach really was "Do something
funny" and there wasn't a lot of structure. There was feedback of
something sucked, obviously, or just didn't get any type of laughs,
whatsoever, but where did that structure develop? Did people come
back from, say, the industry and help instill that in some way or
did it just develop organically among the students?