Recommendation of the UC Feasibility Study Steering Committee
2
Recommendation of the Feasibility Study Steering Committee to UC President Drake
After careful deliberation and based on deep consideration of the report of the Feasibility Study
Work Group (FSWG), attached, the Feasibility Study Steering Committee (FSSC) has
determined that it is neither feasible nor desirable to create or develop a new test to take
the place of the SAT or ACT in UC admissions.
Throughout FSSC discussions, deliberators debated over the utilization of the Smarter Balanced
Assessment (SB) as a potential solution, perhaps with modifications, to add an additional data
point to the other sources of evidence utilized for admissions purposes. SB is required of all
public school students in California in 11
th
grade and in 15 other states or territories across the
United States; the Steering Committee hastens to note concerns around avoiding high-stakes
testing contexts (explained below). As described below, we propose that the Smarter
Balanced Assessment (SB) be further studied and evaluated and that it be considered for
use in a manner that is different from the previous high-stakes use of the SAT or ACT.
The SB has several features that render it worth further interrogation and consideration as a
source of admissions data for a state university system that has already predicated part of its
admissions decisions on course requirements that have been incorporated in the state’s K–12
curriculum system in ways that are intended to leverage stronger learning for students before
they enter college (viz., A-G course requirements). First, SB assesses the Common Core
curriculum adopted in California, which the Board of Admissions and Relations to Schools
(BOARS), of UC’s Academic Senate, has also integrated into California’s A-G course
requirements. In addition, SB is criterion-referenced rather than norm-referenced: It is designed
to measure curriculum-based knowledge and skills (like Advanced Placement or International
Baccalaureate tests are designed to do) rather than to create a normal curve that ranks students
against each other, benchmarked against a norming group that represents the most advantaged
students. Furthermore, the SB was designed to represent higher-order thinking and performance
skills as well as open-ended performance tasks in English language arts and mathematics that
require research, inquiry, writing and problem-solving of the kind required in college.
For these reasons, the FSSC believes that the SB may provide a tool that affords more students
from diverse backgrounds important opportunities to show what they know and can do.
The Importance of Lessening the “Stakes”
Both the FSSC and the FSWG expressed strong passion and commitment to avoid having any
new test become a high-stakes test like the SAT and the ACT. The FSSC understands, as does
the FSWG, that “high-stakes” testing has educationally distorting effects, effects that also have
negative psychological and equity impacts. That is, when test scores are overly relied upon to
make important decisions about students (or their teachers, their schools/districts, etc.), a range
of threats and anxiety result. Moreover, educationally inappropriate (even illegal) behaviors can
result from efforts to increase a student’s status on the test. To the contrary, “low-stakes” testing